The Rough Notes Company Inc.
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • RN Newsletter
  • Products & Solutions
  • Media Kits
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
    • Catalog
    • Enter Promo Code
    • Pay Your Existing Bill Here
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • RN Newsletter
  • Products & Solutions
  • Media Kits
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
    • Catalog
    • Enter Promo Code
    • Pay Your Existing Bill Here
No Result
View All Result
The Rough Notes Company Inc.
No Result
View All Result
Home Court Decisions

Good news for roofer

May 2, 2025

INSURANCE-RELATED COURT CASES
Digested from case reports published online
COURT DECISIONS

Good news for roofer

Thomas Napolitano, a roofing business owner, sought a judgment declaring that Ace American Insurance Company, a workers compensation carrier, was obligated to defend and indemnify him in connection with a claim filed by his employee. The trial court granted Napolitano’s motion for summary judgment, determining that Ace did not effectively cancel the workers compensation policy. The court found that the conflicting notices provided by Ace, including a noncooperation notice and a cancellation notice, did not constitute an unambiguous and unequivocal notice of cancellation.

The Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s judgment, concluding that Ace effectively canceled the policy before the employee’s injury by complying with the requirements of a statute that governs the reporting and cancellation of workers compensation policies. Ace argued that the Appellate Court incorrectly concluded that the cancellation notice effectively canceled the policy. Napolitano appealed.

The Supreme Court of Connecticut reviewed the case and concluded that insurers must strictly comply with the statute when canceling a workers compensation policy. Compliance with the statute, however, does not supplant an insurer’s obligations under contract law, which requires that a notice of cancellation must be definite, certain, and unambiguous.

The court held that the Appellate Court incorrectly limited its analysis to the statutory compliance and failed to consider all relevant communications between the parties.

The Supreme Court found that Ace’s notice of cancellation was not objectively definite and certain, because of the conflicting noncooperation and cancellation notices, which provided indefinite and ambiguous information about the status of Napolitano’s insurance coverage. Consequently, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Appellate Court and remanded the case with direction to affirm the trial court’s judgment in favor of Napolitano.

Napolitano v. Ace American Insurance Company—Supreme Court of Connecticut—No. SC20922—December 24, 2024.

 

Tags: Court DecisionsGood news for rooferinsurance industry
Previous Post

Appraisal outcome freezes compensation

Next Post

Liberal interpretation of pollution exclusion

Next Post

Liberal interpretation of pollution exclusion

FEATURES/ COLUMNS/ DEPARTMENTS

  • Agency of the Month (99)
  • Agency Partners (38)
  • Alternative Risk Transfer (28)
  • Benefits & Financial Services (159)
  • Benefits Lead (104)
  • Commercial Lines (122)
  • Court Decisions (335)
  • Coverage Concerns (176)
  • Excess and Specialty Lines (102)
  • From The Latest Issue (561)
  • General Articles (265)
  • Management (789)
  • Marketing (2)
  • Organizational Profiles (82)
  • Personal Lines (100)
  • Producers Blog (53)
  • RN Blog Top Q&A For Agents (84)
  • Specialty Lines (257)
  • Technology (175)
  • Trending Blogs (158)
  • Young Professionals (105)
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • RN Newsletter
  • Products & Solutions
  • Media Kits
  • Contact Us
  • Shop

By continuing to browse the site, you agree to the data collection and processing practices disclosed in our recently updated privacy policy.

©The Rough Notes Company. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a database or retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or by other means, except as expressly permitted by the publisher. For permission contact Samuel W. Berman.

Sitemap

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • RN Newsletter
  • Products & Solutions
  • Media Kits
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
    • Catalog
    • Enter Promo Code
    • Pay Your Existing Bill Here

By continuing to browse the site, you agree to the data collection and processing practices disclosed in our recently updated privacy policy.

©The Rough Notes Company. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a database or retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or by other means, except as expressly permitted by the publisher. For permission contact Samuel W. Berman.

Sitemap